The Real Cost of Waiting for the "Perfect" Full-Time Hire
The seat sits empty, but it’s business as usual.
That is the part CEOs underestimate when they decide to wait for the exact right full-time marketing hire before filling a leadership gap. The team does not stop moving just because there’s no one leading it. What actually happens is worse: capable, competent people are left to make decisions that are above their pay grade on their own, and what erodes first is their confidence in the calls they're now asked to make without anyone above them to weigh in. The average executive search runs about 4 months, with a wide spread from as little as 6 weeks to as long as 45. A lot can stall out in that window of time.
What Actually Happens During the Gap
The pipeline of what needs to move forward (or what needs to get killed), hangs in limbo waiting on someone to make the call. Often another functional leader gets pulled in to fill the gap, making marketing decisions through a completely different lens than the role requires, which means the work gets reworked once experienced leadership finally arrives. Momentum that was building gets put on the back burner, or a new leader walks in with a different agenda than what the team has already been executing against, and all of that time and development gets lost in the shuffle.
The people cost is the part that does not show up on a spreadsheet until it is too late. I have seen good marketing talent leave during this exact kind of gap, because they want to keep growing and nobody is there to support them. They are doing the job without anyone managing them, mentoring them, or championing their work, and if that goes on long enough, the frustration wins out. There is also a quieter resentment that builds when someone informally steps up to cover the gap without the title, the pay, or the recognition that should come with it, and that frustration tends to outlast the vacancy itself once the permanent hire finally arrives.
What I Tell a CEO Who Wants to Wait
I do not try to talk anyone out of their instinct to wait for the right person. What I do instead is share what I have actually seen, both as an executive in corporate marketing roles and in the fractional roles I have filled since. I have stepped into gaps left by a vacated role and gaps left by a leave of absence, and in both cases, the read afterward was the same: what got accomplished with someone in the seat versus what would not have happened at all if it had stayed empty.
That is less a matter of opinion and more a matter of what I have watched happen twice over. Filling the gap with fractional leadership buys the business time, without forcing a rushed hire out of pressure, and it can double as a live test drive. It shows the organization what strong marketing leadership can do for the business, on their own timeline and their own budget, while the pipeline for the eventual permanent hire runs in parallel instead of racing against a stalled function.
What a Seat Sitting Empty Is Actually Worth
The median annual wage for a chief executive is $206,420. Think of that number less as a price tag and more as a way to picture the value of the seat that job description represents. Every month that seat sits empty during a 4-month average search is a month that value is producing nothing for the business, while the team underneath it makes do without direction.
The Real Question
The real question is never whether the perfect full-time person exists somewhere out there. It is what the business is willing to let happen while the search for that person runs its course. Think of it as the opportunity cost. A position description gets built for what the role sounds like, instead of what the business specifically needs right now, is part of why some roles get posted and reposted for months without ever getting filled. The gap does not just cost momentum. It costs the trust of the people who kept the lights on in the meantime, while nobody was minding the store.
What is the actual cost of the gap you're currently experiencing while waiting for the perfect full time hire?
PS. I've stepped in to cover both a vacated leadership role and a leave of absence. Same feedback both times: people could point to exactly what got done, and what simply wouldn't have without someone in the seat. If you're sitting on a gap like that right now, let's talk.